It’s Time to End Civil Forfeitures for Good
The Burlington Free Press reported on October 27th that the Vermont U.S. Attorney’s Office had filed papers for the civil forfeiture of the Lambda Iota fraternity house on Pearl St. in Burlington because a few fraternity members were allegedly selling drugs, and two members of the Board of Governors were among the customers. (The article closely follows a press release from the U.S. Attorney.) Meanwhile the property’s owners, the 600+ member Lambda Iota Society, are the ones in line to take the loss. This seems like a return to the real estate feeding frenzy during the bad old days of the George Terwilliger administration (1986-1991), an administration severely criticized by U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy.
The civil forfeiture statutes rely on the absurd notion that the property itself is guilty, and real estate can still be forfeited even though the owner has been found innocent of any underlying crimes. The abuses of these statutes were so numerous and so blatant that many U.S. Attorneys turned instead to the criminal forfeiture statutes in cases where forfeiture was warranted. Congress also stepped in, most recently passing the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (See 18 USC 983(d)) Apparently it’s still not enough to protect innocent owners from legalized theft by the federal government.